Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Mai Hontama Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jul at 05:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs M. Hontama

GER
2
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Friedsam 2 - 0 Hontama
They have played 6 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 4 and Mai Hontama winning 2. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Mai Hontama was at the Eupago Porto Open - Porto, 18-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Friedsam | 2 |
| Hontama | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) Eupago Porto Open - Porto(07-18-25)
(Q3) ASB Classic - Auckland(12-29-24)
A. Friedsam vs M. Hontama H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $635,248 |
| 59.94% (398-266) | Career Total W/L | 58.20% (291-209) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 4 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
A. Friedsam vs M. Hontama Match Preview:
- Second Serve Points: Friedsam has shown a slight edge in recent second serve performance with a success rate of 41.19% compared to Hontama's 40.15%. Is this minor advantage significant in determining the victor?
- Return Game Performance: Hontama holds a narrow advantage, capturing 50.07% of points on opponents' second serves, while Friedsam has managed 48%. Why could this be a key factor in her favor?
- Under Pressure: Friedsam appears more resilient under pressure, saving 54.69% of breakpoints versus Hontama's 44.79%. Could this be decisive in clutch moments?
- Overall Match Performance (Last Year): Friedsam has been more successful, winning 71.7% of matches, compared to Hontama's 44.64%. Does this create a strong case for Friedsam?
- Surface Proficiency: Friedsam excels on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Hontama's best is 61% on hard courts. How will these preferences influence the match outcome?
- Tournament Level Experience (Last Year): Friedsam has excelled at Challengers/ITF tournaments, boasting a 75.61% win rate, compared to Hontama's 46.67% at the same level. Does experience at this level favor Friedsam?
- Head-to-Head Record: In their previous encounter, Friedsam emerged victorious. Could this indicate a psychological edge?
- Deciding Set Performance: Friedsam has triumphed 68% of the time in deciding sets over the past year, whereas Hontama only 33%. What does this say about their resilience?
- Break Point Conversion: Both players exhibit efficiency in converting break points with Hontama slightly ahead. Will this impact the game's dynamics during key moments?
Editorial Prediction (July 18, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Friedsam and Hontama presents a fascinating clash of strengths and weaknesses. Friedsam edges ahead in second serve performance and breakpoint saving ability, factors that could prove vital under high-pressure situations. Moreover, her historical success in deciding sets underscores a resilience that could tip the balance in tight moments.
On the flip side, Hontama shows prowess in return games, particularly against first serves, indicating a possible strategic advantage. However, her historical outcomes suggest room for improvement under match-deciding pressures. Given Friedsam's superior win records, both overall and on her preferred surfaces, she appears better equipped to withstand the duress of competitive play.
Taking a holistic view of these metrics, and considering the context of past encounters, Anna-Lena Friedsam is more likely to emerge victorious in this tightly contested matchup. However, Hontama's strengths could still push the match into a gripping display of competitive tennis.
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Mai Hontama Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Friedsam vs M. Hontama H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 33 | Games Won | 31 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:28:35 | Average Match Time | 2:28:35 |
| 67% (138/205) | 1st Serve % | 72% (147/205) |
| 64% (89/138) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (89/147) |
| 55% (37/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (29/58) |
| 33% (9/27) | Break Pts Won % | 53% (9/17) |
| 42% (87/205) | Return Points Win % | 39% (79/205) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 7-6(0) 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
M. Hontama Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 7-6(4) | ||
F | L | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||

A. Friedsam vs M. Hontama Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.94% (398/266) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.20% (291/209) |
| 57.98% (897/650) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.03% (649/489) |
| 53.48% (7684/6683) | Games Win/Loss | 53.33% (5480/4796) |
| 55.67% (108/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.73% (218/147) |
| 59.66% (139/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.57% (30/26) |
| 66.83% (135/67) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (36/28) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1583 | Aces Total | 209 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1702 | Total Double Faults | 1447 |
| 1:11:45 | Average Match Time | 1:31:55 |
| 466.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.35 |
| 65% (22459/34590) | 1st Serve % | 67% (20419/30466) |
| 65% (14646/22459) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (11973/20419) |
| 46% (5576/12129) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4549/10033) |
| 45% (1711/3768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2120/4250) |
| 43% (14589/34179) | Return Points Win % | 48% (15010/30996) |
| 36.84% (21/36) | Slam W/L | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 80.00% (8/2) |
| 52.88% (101/90) | Main Tour W/L | 47.62% (30/33) |
| 67.85% (211/100) | Challenger W/L | 59.52% (200/136) |
| 76.81% (53/16) | Futures W/L | 70.00% (28/12) |
| 60% (389/650) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (288/492) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (91/176) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (48/96) |
| 54% (123/229) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (75/144) |
| 85% (391/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (284/247) |
| 14% (391/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (284/36) |
| 23% (273/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (216/44) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
